Slide 1

Jonathan D. Sousa

Index of Slides

  1. Making Library Assessment Work Practical Approaches for Developing and Sustaining Effective Assessment
  2. No Title
  3. Rise of User-Centered Library Concept and the Culture of Assessment in the 1990’s
  4. ARL New Measures 1999- Key Areas
  5. Why Assess?
  6. Common Assessment Barriers
  7. Making Library Assessment Work: Practical Approaches for Developing and Sustaining Effective Assessment
  8. What Are We Measuring?
  9. Prioritize Assessment Activities
  10. “…but to suppose that the facts, once established in all their fullness, will ‘speak for themselves’ is an illusion.”
  11. What Does it Mean? Understanding Your Data
  12. Communicating and Using Results
  13. Effective Assessment Easier Said Than Done
  14. Two Approaches to Effective and Sustainable Assessment
  15. University of Virginia Library Organizing for Assessment
  16. Collecting the Data at U.Va.
  17. Customer Surveys
  18. No Title
  19. Faculty Priorities 1993 to 2004
  20. Top Priorities at UVa Comparison of Faculty and Students
  21. Staff Surveys
  22. Data Mining
  23. Acquisitions Expenditures by Format University of Virginia Library
  24. Expenditures of UVA Academic Division 1989—2003
  25. The Balanced Scorecard Managing and Assessing Data
  26. Metrics
  27. Rationale for the BSC: Getting Control of the Data
  28. What Do We Measure?
  29. Metric U.1.A: Overall Rating in Student and Faculty Surveys.
  30. Metric U.4.B: Turnaround Time for User Requests
  31. Metric U.3.A: Circulation of New Monographs
  32. Metric I.3.B. Staff Survey Rating of Internal Service Activities
  33. Using Data for Results at UVa
  34. Growing Assessment at UW From Project-Based to Ongoing and Sustainable
  35. UW Libraries Assessment Organization
  36. UW Libraries Assessment Methods
  37. Guided Observation Bibliographic Database Searching
  38. Focus Groups (2003) Library Research Competencies of Undergrads
  39. UW Triennial Library Use Survey Number of Respondents and Response Rate 1992-2004 Large number of respondents allows for analysis within groups
  40. Physical Visits Down, Remote Use Up UW Libraries Use Patterns 1998-2004 (% of each group who use library at least weekly)
  41. Faculty Library Use Patterns 2001/2004 by Academic Area (Those who use libraries at least weekly)
  42. Use Libraries at Least Twice Per Week (Remote and In-Person) 1998 - 2004 by Group
  43. Resources Used Remotely Twice Per Week or More: Faculty and Graduate Students
  44. Print/Online Priority by Academic Area Faculty 1998, 2001, 2004 (% in each group identifying as priority)
  45. Overall Satisfaction by Group 1995-2004
  46. Assessing Branch Library Viability Data-Based Decision Making
  47. In-Library/Reserve Use 1997-98 to 2003-04 Science (5) and Fine Arts (4) Branch Libraries
  48. No Title
  49. Science/Engineering Faculty Libraries Used Regularly (2004 Survey)
  50. No Title
  51. What We’ve Learned About/From the UW Community
  52. How UW Has Used Assessment Information
  53. Moving Forward
  54. For more information…

Return to Format List