Index of Slides
- Making Library Assessment Work Practical Approaches for Developing and Sustaining Effective Assessment
- No Title
- Rise of User-Centered Library Concept and the Culture of Assessment in the 1990’s
- ARL New Measures 1999- Key Areas
- Why Assess?
- Common Assessment Barriers
- Making Library Assessment Work: Practical Approaches for Developing and Sustaining Effective Assessment
- What Are We Measuring?
- Prioritize Assessment Activities
- “…but to suppose that the facts, once established in all their fullness, will ‘speak for themselves’ is an illusion.”
- What Does it Mean? Understanding Your Data
- Communicating and Using Results
- Effective Assessment Easier Said Than Done
- Two Approaches to Effective and Sustainable Assessment
- University of Virginia Library Organizing for Assessment
- Collecting the Data at U.Va.
- Customer Surveys
- No Title
- Faculty Priorities 1993 to 2004
- Top Priorities at UVa Comparison of Faculty and Students
- Staff Surveys
- Data Mining
- Acquisitions Expenditures by Format University of Virginia Library
- Expenditures of UVA Academic Division 1989—2003
- The Balanced Scorecard Managing and Assessing Data
- Metrics
- Rationale for the BSC: Getting Control of the Data
- What Do We Measure?
- Metric U.1.A: Overall Rating in Student and Faculty Surveys.
- Metric U.4.B: Turnaround Time for User Requests
- Metric U.3.A: Circulation of New Monographs
- Metric I.3.B. Staff Survey Rating of Internal Service Activities
- Using Data for Results at UVa
- Growing Assessment at UW From Project-Based to Ongoing and Sustainable
- UW Libraries Assessment Organization
- UW Libraries Assessment Methods
- Guided Observation Bibliographic Database Searching
- Focus Groups (2003) Library Research Competencies of Undergrads
- UW Triennial Library Use Survey Number of Respondents and Response Rate 1992-2004 Large number of respondents allows for analysis within groups
- Physical Visits Down, Remote Use Up UW Libraries Use Patterns 1998-2004 (% of each group who use library at least weekly)
- Faculty Library Use Patterns 2001/2004 by Academic Area (Those who use libraries at least weekly)
- Use Libraries at Least Twice Per Week (Remote and In-Person) 1998 - 2004 by Group
- Resources Used Remotely Twice Per Week or More: Faculty and Graduate Students
- Print/Online Priority by Academic Area Faculty 1998, 2001, 2004 (% in each group identifying as priority)
- Overall Satisfaction by Group 1995-2004
- Assessing Branch Library Viability Data-Based Decision Making
- In-Library/Reserve Use 1997-98 to 2003-04 Science (5) and Fine Arts (4) Branch Libraries
- No Title
- Science/Engineering Faculty Libraries Used Regularly (2004 Survey)
- No Title
- What We’ve Learned About/From the UW Community
- How UW Has Used Assessment Information
- Moving Forward
- For more information…