~ B & D Committee Meeting Minutes ~
37th Annual AAASS Convention (Salt Lake City), November 3-6, 2005………………………………………………………………………………………….
I. Call to order, introductions, brief announcements
II. Transitions
III. B and D Committee Report
The Pre-conference Workshop on Digital Resources, sponsored bienially by B and D, was coordinated by Miranda and held on Thursday morning of the conference in a nice facility with up-to-date equipment. There were 20 registrations and comments from attendees were complimentary. The sessions were excellent.
The goal was to provide an introduction to faculty, and yet half of the attendees were librarians. Any suggestions about how to bring in faculty? Future workshops should have:
IV. Reports of B& D subcommittees
Miranda introduced Professor David Birnbaum from the University of Pittsburgh, who represents teaching faculty on B and D.
The Group now has a website at Illinois: http://www.library.uiuc.edu/spx/BnD/DigPro.htm.
Originally the group had five areas of interest: documentation of projects (inventory), vendor relations, information sharing, training, and institutional repositories. For the time being they are focusing on the first 4.
The inventory is already up at the Illinois site. It is keyword searchable in both English and in Cyrillic. Advanced search is not ready yet, but the browse function is already available for projects and collections by name of project, creator, digital process, goal of project, subject, chronological focus, geographic focus, language, and original format. The inventory currently contains approximately 100 projects and 240 collections. Web submission forms for additions will also be available soon; they are still being tested.
Concerning vendor relations, Eastview sent a list of 13 potential journals as candidates for digitization. The Committee solicited and received input from 7 institutions, created a list of rankings and gave it to Eastview; it is also on the website. There was discussion of the survey and how it could have been done better if the Committee had been given more time. Andy will write up a report on it.
On July 30 Brad met with JSTOR concerning the inclusion of Slavic publications in that database. Candidates include 19th century Russian thick journals, and East European 19th century nonCyrillic journals. JSTOR wants a wish list of titles, and seeks to work with SEES, as well as with AAASS. It is not certain that anything will come of this, but it is good to put in our own two cents. The last time that JSTOR tried to handle Cyrillic it couldn’t, but now it can.
As regards training, the Committee has participated in the Digital Text Workshop at the Illinois Summer Lab and has sponsored panels at AAASS. Next year’s panel might focus on the academic or scholarly side of digitization.
For information sharing they put up their website and have a FAQ. They are considering a wiki-type site, as well as a listserv devoted to digital issues regarding the practical side of digitization projects. The group also brought up the issues of vendors as listserv participants. Keeping a listserv closed to vendors would prevent both groups from benefiting from each other’s knowledge. On the other hand, some librarians feel that some discussions wouldn’t be as open as they have been.
They also want to keep abreast of the move to establish institutional repositories: Slavic librarians must keep abreast of happenings at their own institutions. The DLF Aquifer project is an example of this.
V. Consortial and Institutional Announcements and Issues
This year the deadlines for newsletter submissions are being moved up. They especially want reports on international conferences. For example, Harry Leich sent a report on ICCEES in Berlin.
Other information from Great Britain:
VI. Institutional Announcements
VII. New Business
VIII. Proposals of Program Topics for AAASS 2006 in Washington D.C.
IX. Demonstration of Access to Russian Archives (TitleVI-funded database).
They want feedback. It is difficult to get archivists to participate. Pat Grimsted has brought up the possibility of merging with ArcheoBiblioBase, but her database is on a very old server, and it would take lots of work to convert. IDC has lots of guides and there is the possibility of expanding the project to include them. When completed, Rosarkhiv will have a copy of the database, and perhaps Eastview will also.
………………………………………………………………………………………….